Walter Map | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 24 pages of analysis & critique of Walter Map.

Walter Map | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 24 pages of analysis & critique of Walter Map.
This section contains 7,022 words
(approx. 24 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Monika Otter

SOURCE: "Underground Treasures: The Other Worlds of William Malmesbury, William of Newburgh, and Walter Map" in Inventiones: Fiction and Referentiality in Twelfth-Century English Historical Writing, The University of North Carolina Press, 1996, pp. 93-128.

In the following excerpt, Otter describes Map as "an extremely self-aware narrator," blurring the lines between fiction and fact as other Medieval historians have done, but more intensely aware than they seem to have been that his "history" lacks a reliable foundation.

… A fuller, more properly self-referential use of the Liar [paradox] is one of the major premises of Walter Map's De Nugis Curialium. Walter can be called a historian only in a rather loose sense. De Nugis Curialium, his only surviving work, is a collection of anecdotes, facetiae, and short tracts.65 But Walter, as we have already seen, is interested in definitions of history, and his ambition in De Nugis is to be a...

(read more)

This section contains 7,022 words
(approx. 24 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Monika Otter
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Monika Otter from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.