Ambrosius Theodosius Macrobius | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 37 pages of analysis & critique of Ambrosius Theodosius Macrobius.

Ambrosius Theodosius Macrobius | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 37 pages of analysis & critique of Ambrosius Theodosius Macrobius.
This section contains 10,690 words
(approx. 36 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Alan Cameron

SOURCE: Cameron, Allan. “The Date and Identity of Macrobius.” Journal of Roman Studies 56 (1966): 25-38.

In the following essay, Cameron provides evidence for his argument that scholars have erred in linking the Macrobius found in certain records with the author Macrobius; that the author was known to his contemporaries as Theodosius; and that the Saturnalia probably dates from about 431.

It has long been recognized that Macrobius' Saturnalia and Commentary on Cicero's Somnium Scipionis are no less important as social documents of their times than for the precious antiquarian and neoplatonic lore they preserve. But which times? And who was Macrobius?

In view of our relatively abundant prosopographical material from the late fourth and early fifth centuries, there should be a fair chance of identifying a man whose full name and rank stand on record: Macrobius Ambrosius Theodosius,1 vir clarissimus et insulstris.

The Theodosian Code can show three Macrobii holding...

(read more)

This section contains 10,690 words
(approx. 36 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Alan Cameron
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Alan Cameron from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.