Macbeth | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 22 pages of analysis & critique of Macbeth.

Macbeth | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 22 pages of analysis & critique of Macbeth.
This section contains 5,946 words
(approx. 20 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Irena R. Makaryk

SOURCE: Makaryk, Irena R. “Shakespeare Right and Wrong.” Theatre Journal 50, no. 2 (1998): 153-63.

In the following review, Makaryk describes avant-garde Ukrainian director Les' Kurbas's 1924 modernistic, anti-bourgeois production of Macbeth, citing its ironic and expressionistic methods and stylized form.

In an interview in Gambit in 1970, Edward Bond remarked that, as a society, “we use the play [King Lear] in a wrong way. And it's for that reason I would like to rewrite it so that we now have to use the play for ourselves, for our society, for our time, for our problems.”1 For Bond, “wrong” Shakespeare is academic Shakespeare, while “right” Shakespeare is a transformed and contemporary Shakespeare. Bond's clear-cut division of approaches to Shakespeare is quintessentially modernist in its rejection of “museum” Shakespeare in favour of a reworked classic for our time. His division of approaches into right and wrong also points to the main line of argument...

(read more)

This section contains 5,946 words
(approx. 20 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Irena R. Makaryk
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Irena R. Makaryk from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.