Luce Irigaray | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 36 pages of analysis & critique of Luce Irigaray.

Luce Irigaray | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 36 pages of analysis & critique of Luce Irigaray.
This section contains 9,208 words
(approx. 31 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Maggie Berg

SOURCE: Berg, Maggie. “Luce Irigaray's ‘Contradictions’: Poststructuralism and Feminism.” Signs 17, no. 1 (autumn 1991): 50-70.

In the following essay, Berg proposes an ironic reading of “When Our Lips Speak Together,” situating Irigaray's “lips” metaphor as a counterpart to Lacan's “phallus” metaphor.

The work of Luce Irigaray is regarded by many feminists as riven with contradictions: she is a poststructuralist and a Lacanian insofar as she believes that the subject is a discursive construct, making identity unstable; but, in order to rescue women from what she sees as the repressive effects of phallocentrism, she apparently proposes an alternative feminine discourse modeled on the female genitals.1 Irigaray's “lips” have become the basis of debate: those critics (including Plaza, Jones, Moi, Burke) who regard her work as naive (it suggests the possibility of a prediscursive sexual identity) and dangerously essentialist (it posits an eternal essential femininity) have occasioned widespread feminist suspicion of poststructuralism...

(read more)

This section contains 9,208 words
(approx. 31 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Maggie Berg
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Maggie Berg from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.