September 11, 2001 attacks | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 5 pages of analysis & critique of September 11, 2001 attacks.

September 11, 2001 attacks | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 5 pages of analysis & critique of September 11, 2001 attacks.
This section contains 1,153 words
(approx. 4 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by David Edwards

SOURCE: Edwards, David. Review of 9-11, by Noam Chomsky. Ecologist 32, no. 1 (February 2002): 69-70.

In the following review, Edwards presents an overview of Noam Chomsky's central arguments in 9-11.

‘Ha ha ha to the pacifists’, wrote Christopher Hitchens in November, as Kabul fell to the combined might of US bombers, the Northern Alliance, and the BBC's, ‘Simpson of Kabul’. Two months later, the victory celebrations continue tirelessly (almost maniacally), as the ‘first virtual war’ draws to a close. It was ‘an instant, foolproof, bloodless recipe, like Delia Smith for bombers’, crowed the Observer's Mary Riddell, demonstrating due respect for the untold numbers of civilian victims incinerated by US bombs and starving to death in the frozen hills of Afghanistan.

But, once again, history will not end here. And, as Noam Chomsky makes clear in [9-11, a] tiny, essential book of interviews, history is sure to swallow the vapid...

(read more)

This section contains 1,153 words
(approx. 4 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by David Edwards
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by David Edwards from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.