François de La Rochefoucauld (writer) | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 17 pages of analysis & critique of François de La Rochefoucauld (writer).

François de La Rochefoucauld (writer) | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 17 pages of analysis & critique of François de La Rochefoucauld (writer).
This section contains 4,362 words
(approx. 15 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Quentin M. Hope

SOURCE: Hope, Quentin M. “Humor in the Maximes of La Rochefoucauld.” Dalhousie French Studies 58 (spring 2002): 3-9.

In this essay, Hope discusses La Rochefoucauld's love of teasing, making fun, and laughter, and claims that many of his maxims should be understood as jokes.

I have undertaken to write about humor in La Rochefoucauld fully convinced that any reader will know what I mean by humor, but also aware that the word, like other words close to it, eludes definition. In L'écriture comique Jean Sareil speaks of the “impossibilité d'arriver à une définition objective du sujet” and adds: “Qu'est-ce que l'esprit, l'humour, la satire, l'ironie? Bien malin qui pourrait répondre à cette question” (14). Robert Escarpit agrees. He entitles the introduction to his L'humour, “L'impossible définition.”

In his excellent introduction to what has become the standard twentieth-century edition of the Maximes, Jacques Truchet mentions the humorous element in La...

(read more)

This section contains 4,362 words
(approx. 15 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Quentin M. Hope
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Quentin M. Hope from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.