Akira Kurosawa | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 12 pages of analysis & critique of Akira Kurosawa.

Akira Kurosawa | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 12 pages of analysis & critique of Akira Kurosawa.
This section contains 3,557 words
(approx. 12 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Akira Kurosawa

SOURCE: "From the Baroque to Wabi: Translating Animal Imagery from Shakespeare's King Lear to Kurosawa's Ran," in Literature/Film Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 2, 1997, pp. 146-51.

[In the following essay, Kane follows the translation of animal imagery from King Lear to Ran, as it is affected by the Japanese concept of minimalism.]

One comes away from viewing Akira Kurosawa's Ran, a cinematic adaptation of Shakespeare's King Lear set in sixteenth-century Japan, with the distinct impression that Shakespeare's poetry has been jettisoned in favor of visual imagery. Screenwriters Kurosawa, Hideo Oguni, and Ide Masato have seemingly pared dialogue to the minimum necessary to advance the plot. Where Shakespeare's King Lear takes sixty-nine lines of gorgeous blank verse to divide up his kingdom, for example, Kurosawa's Hidetora spends only a few staccato sentences. The viewer's impression of linguistic minimalism in Ran is borne up by former visual artist Kurosawa's reputation for distrusting...

(read more)

This section contains 3,557 words
(approx. 12 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Akira Kurosawa
Copyrights
Gale
Akira Kurosawa from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.