2001: A Space Odyssey | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 1 page of analysis & critique of 2001: A Space Odyssey.

2001: A Space Odyssey | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 1 page of analysis & critique of 2001: A Space Odyssey.
This section contains 280 words
(approx. 1 page at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Tim Hunter, with Stephen Kaplan and Peter Jaszi

As a film about progress—physical, social, and technological—Stanley Kubrick's huge and provocative 2001: A Space Odyssey remains essentially linear until its extraordinary ending. In the final transfiguration, director Kubrick and co-author Arthur Clarke … suggest that evolutionary progress may in fact be cyclical, perhaps in the shape of a helix formation. Man progresses to a certain point in evolution, then begins again from scratch on a higher level. Much of 2001's conceptual originality derives from its being both anti-Christian and anti-evolutionary in its theme of man's progress controlled by an ambiguous extra-terrestrial force, possibly both capricious and destructive….

2001 is, among other things, a slow-paced intricate stab at creating an aesthetic from natural and material things we have never seen before…. (p. 12)

If Kubrick's superb film has a problem, it may simply be that great philosophical-metaphysical films about human progress and man's relationship to the cosmos have one strike...

(read more)

This section contains 280 words
(approx. 1 page at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Tim Hunter, with Stephen Kaplan and Peter Jaszi
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Tim Hunter, with Stephen Kaplan and Peter Jaszi from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.