Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 2 pages of analysis & critique of Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb.

Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 2 pages of analysis & critique of Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb.
This section contains 529 words
(approx. 2 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Andrew Sarris

The great merit of Dr. Strangelove is its bad taste. It is silly to argue that we have the right to say anything we want but that to exercise this right is the height of irresponsibility. Responsible art is dead art, and a sane (no pun intended) film on the bomb would have been a deadly bore.

Given the basic premise of nuclear annihilation, the zany conception of Stanley Kubrick, Terry Southern, and Peter George has much to commend it. Where my critical fallout with most of my colleagues occurs is in the realm of execution. Aided by the tightest scenario since Rashomon, and the most deceptive as far as directorial exercises go, Kubrick has been hailed in many quarters as the greatest director since D. W. Griffith. (p. 181)

Since Kubrick's major shortcoming, like Kurosawa's, is in structuring (or rather in failing to structure) his films with a...

(read more)

This section contains 529 words
(approx. 2 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Andrew Sarris
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Andrew Sarris from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.