Four Past Midnight | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of Four Past Midnight.

Four Past Midnight | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of Four Past Midnight.
This section contains 613 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Andy Solomon

SOURCE: "Scared but Safe," in New York Times Book Review, September 2, 1990, p. 21.

In the following review, Solomon argues that although there is nothing new in King's Four Past Midnight, it is a difficult book to put down.

A decade ago, in Danse Macabre, Stephen King made his literary esthetic clear: "I try to terrorize the reader. But if … I cannot terrify … I will try to horrify; and if I find I cannot horrify, I'll go for the gross-out. I'm not proud." The figures on his royalty checks suggest this strategy works, and he sticks to it closely in Four Past Midnight. Unlike Mr. King's adventurous novel The Eyes of the Dragon, this quartet of short novels risks few departures from earlier form.

By now, everyone knows Stephen King's flaws: tone-deaf narration, papier-mâché characters, clichés, gratuitous vulgarity, self-indulgent digressions. Each is amply present in these pages ringing...

(read more)

This section contains 613 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Andy Solomon
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Andy Solomon from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.