King Lear | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 32 pages of analysis & critique of King Lear.

King Lear | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 32 pages of analysis & critique of King Lear.
This section contains 8,638 words
(approx. 29 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Edward Pechter

SOURCE: Pechter, Edward. “On the Blinding of Gloucester.” ELH 45, no. 2 (summer 1978): 181-200.

In the following essay, Pechter elucidates a pattern of vengeance, punishment, and suffering in King Lear.

We are in the midst of a revolution in Lear criticism. Only six years ago A. L. French declared:

I can confidently say that there is a received reading of Lear—‘received’ in the sense that pretty well everyone seems to accept it. It is a reading that reached full explicitness in Bradley … [who] proposed that we should change the title to “The Redemption of King Lear”, because the intention of the gods was ‘neither to torment him, nor to teach him a “noble anger,” but to lead him to attain through apparently hopeless failure the very end and aim of life’. In the Bradleyan context, ‘redemption’, and … ‘purification’ … don't have any specifically theological overtones; but in his successors such...

(read more)

This section contains 8,638 words
(approx. 29 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Edward Pechter
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Edward Pechter from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.