King John | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 14 pages of analysis & critique of King John.

King John | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 14 pages of analysis & critique of King John.
This section contains 3,634 words
(approx. 13 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Sidney C. Burgoyne

SOURCE: Burgoyne, Sidney C. “Cardinal Pandulph and the ‘Curse of Rome.’” College Literature 4, no. 3 (fall 1977): 232-40.

In the following essay, Burgoyne stresses Cardinal Pandulph's role as villain and “chief mischief-maker” in King John.

Although holding a minority opinion, a surprising number of writers1 have viewed Cardinal Pandulph, the papal legate, in a kindly light, and some have maintained that in comparison with the source-play2 Shakespeare's King John shows a complete absence of anti-Catholic elements.3 A recent scholar offers a far more perceptive view of the Cardinal but then seems to miss his significance and stage value as the papal legate: “Pandulph is an evil genius—cocksure and skilled in having his own way—who happens to be a papal legate”; and concludes that he is a figure of some stature but only “for a few moments in the play.”4 But to say that he “happens to be a...

(read more)

This section contains 3,634 words
(approx. 13 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Sidney C. Burgoyne
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Sidney C. Burgoyne from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.