Splendor in the Grass | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 1 page of analysis & critique of Splendor in the Grass.

Splendor in the Grass | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 1 page of analysis & critique of Splendor in the Grass.
This section contains 213 words
(approx. 1 page at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by John Coleman

Splendour in the Grass … comes from the canvas-backed chair of Kazan, the typewriter of William Inge and the camera of Boris Kaufman: it is accordingly a very glossy, punchy, expert piece of something or other. Unfortunately, it is also ludicrous. (p. 96)

The end of this packed film (there is an unjustified, recalcitrant air of jumbo novel about it, like Giant) brings together the two kids, now older and saner, in a wistful encounter. They lost that Wordsworthian 'splendour in the grass'—here interpreted as a roll in the hay—presumably for 'strength in what remains behind'…. In ways too devious to recount in full, this long film forfeits seriousness and sympathy by being either too sheerly arranged at crucial times—the girl's parents rocking on the porch in awful symmetry could be advertising anything from bungalows in Los Angeles to a capitalist vodka—or too thunderously repetitious, too...

(read more)

This section contains 213 words
(approx. 1 page at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by John Coleman
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by John Coleman from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.