Big Trouble in Little China | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of Big Trouble in Little China.

Big Trouble in Little China | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of Big Trouble in Little China.
This section contains 704 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Michael Wilmington

SOURCE: Wilmington, Michael. “Big Trouble in Little China is Big Trouble Indeed.” Los Angeles Times (2 July 1986): section 6, p. 10.

In the following review, Wilmington offers a negative assessment of Big Trouble in Little China, calling the film foolish and nonsensical.

There are many dark plots hatching in Big Trouble in Little China. They're being cooked up in devilish hangouts—catacombs beneath the San Francisco streets—by people with names like Needles, the Wild Man and the Sewer Monster, in places like the Honorable Hall of the Infernal Judge and the Room of the Upside-Down Hell. None is darker or deadlier than the movie itself.

Peruse the story and people at your peril: Lo Pan (James Hong), the 2,000-year-old man, celibate for an id-curdling 20 centuries, consumed with lust for green-eyed women. His three martial arts miscreants and kung fu kidnapers: Thunder, Lightning and Rain. Supernatural gangs slugging it out in...

(read more)

This section contains 704 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Michael Wilmington
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Michael Wilmington from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.