In the Mouth of Madness | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 2 pages of analysis & critique of In the Mouth of Madness.

In the Mouth of Madness | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 2 pages of analysis & critique of In the Mouth of Madness.
This section contains 532 words
(approx. 2 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Kevin Thomas

SOURCE: Thomas, Kevin. “Engrossing Madness: A Darkly Humorous Horror Movie.” Los Angeles Times (3 February 1995): F6.

In the following review, Thomas offers a positive assessment of In the Mouth of Madness, calling it “a thinking person's horror film.”

In the Mouth of Madness is a thinking person's horror picture that dares to be as cerebral as it is visceral. An homage to the master of the macabre, novelist H. P. Lovecraft, on the part of its writer Michael De Luca, this handsome, intelligent New Line Cinema production also finds its director, John Carpenter, in top form and provides Sam Neill with one of the most challenging roles of his career—which is saying a lot.

Charlton Heston, Julie Carmen and Jurgen Prochnow round out the key roles impressively; this is hardly your usual roster of horror stars.

Opening with a captivating prologue, In the Mouth of Madness gets off...

(read more)

This section contains 532 words
(approx. 2 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Kevin Thomas
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Kevin Thomas from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.