Jim Crace | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 4 pages of analysis & critique of Jim Crace.
Related Topics

Jim Crace | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 4 pages of analysis & critique of Jim Crace.
This section contains 1,122 words
(approx. 4 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Edward T. Wheeler

SOURCE: Wheeler, Edward T. “Modern Gardening.” Commonweal (18 June 1993): 26–27.

In the following review of Arcadia, Wheeler praises Crace's prose style and powers of imagination, but finds technical flaws in the novel's omniscient narrator and inadequate conclusion.

Jim Crace is of the same generation of British novelists as Martin Amis and Peter Ackroyd; and like them he is a chronicler of the city. Resemblances end quickly after that: where Amis (London Fields) is apocalyptic in theme and “postmodern” in form, Crace is generally affirmative and traditional. Unlike Ackroyd whose English Music seeks to tie London to the eternal English Imagination, Crace offers us a very earthy city, whose assurances are those of survival, of growth from decay. This is a carefully crafted book, one that seems as symmetrical and patterned as a globe artichoke. The prose runs continually to unmarked blank verse, so rhythmic and alive is it to incantation...

(read more)

This section contains 1,122 words
(approx. 4 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Edward T. Wheeler
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Edward T. Wheeler from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.