Jernej Kopitar | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 22 pages of analysis & critique of Jernej Kopitar.

Jernej Kopitar | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 22 pages of analysis & critique of Jernej Kopitar.
This section contains 5,816 words
(approx. 20 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Benjamin Stolz

SOURCE: Stolz, Benjamin. “Kopitar and Vuk: An Assessment of Their Roles in the Rise of the New Serbian Literary Language.” Papers in Slavic Philology 2 (1982): 150-67.

In the following essay, Stolz describes Kopitar's considerable influence on Vuk Karadžić and the modern development of the Serbo-Croatian literary language.

But the most important result of the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars together was the quickening of nationalism, marked by a return to local origins: the collection and imitation of folklore, folk dance, and music, and medieval and Renaissance works. This passed beyond a revival of themes and forms into the rebirth of the use of inhibited languages … in literature.

Francis Scarfe

The scholarly literature on Jernej (Bartholomäus) Kopitar and Vuk Karadžić is so voluminous … that anyone who approaches the topic runs the risk of mere repetition, with slight reinterpretation, or of loose speculation and reckless theorizing. Still, the contribution...

(read more)

This section contains 5,816 words
(approx. 20 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Benjamin Stolz
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Benjamin Stolz from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.