Chaos: Making a New Science | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 14 pages of analysis & critique of Chaos: Making a New Science.

Chaos: Making a New Science | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 14 pages of analysis & critique of Chaos: Making a New Science.
This section contains 3,810 words
(approx. 13 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by John Franks

SOURCE: A review of Chaos, in Mathematical Intelligencer, Vol. 11, No. 1, Winter, 1989, pp. 65–69.

In the following unfavorable review of Chaos, Franks disparages the notion of a “chaos revolution” and objects to Gleick's misrepresentation of chaos theory, fractal geometry, and mathematical methodology.

[Chaos] is a book about new ways in which mathematics is used to model phenomena in the real world. It is intended for a general audience. The author is James Gleick, formerly a science reporter for the New York Times. He does a good job explaining what constitutes a mathematical model (by which he means a differential equation or a difference equation) and what it does. The theme of the book is that even rather simple non-linear models can, and typically do, exhibit extremely sensitive dependence on initial conditions. What this means is that two solutions of a non-linear ordinary differential equation can start with very close initial...

(read more)

This section contains 3,810 words
(approx. 13 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by John Franks
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by John Franks from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.