Kon Ichikawa | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 2 pages of analysis & critique of Kon Ichikawa.

Kon Ichikawa | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 2 pages of analysis & critique of Kon Ichikawa.
This section contains 411 words
(approx. 2 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Tom Allen

It is almost impossible to cite an American director who has aged as gracefully in his idiosyncrasies as Ichikawa over the last three decades. It is also difficult to name a local director who parallels his many permutations of style. Ichikawa's films slide between clinical realism and wry observation of human foibles. There is a chilling haughtiness in his work, yet sometimes he plays to the pit with a low buffoonery that is almost beyond the American sensibility. He is not a classicist so much as an eclectic who has adapted serious literature, popular best sellers, and original material to his own purposes….

Ichikawa, in his 1958 Conflagration, predated the passionate atavism of Equus, yet he had the fine, discreet sense to stay close to the original author, Mishima…. Ichikawa did not employ realism to pierce the hidden mysteries of fanatic pathology. He knew the worth of stylization….

Mr...

(read more)

This section contains 411 words
(approx. 2 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Tom Allen
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Tom Allen from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.