Ian Hamilton (critic) | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 13 pages of analysis & critique of Ian Hamilton (critic).

Ian Hamilton (critic) | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 13 pages of analysis & critique of Ian Hamilton (critic).
This section contains 3,455 words
(approx. 12 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Bevis Hillier

SOURCE: Hillier, Bevis. “Why Did He Leave Out E. M. Forster?” Spectator 283, no. 8929 (25 September 1999): 48-51.

In the following review of The Penguin Book of Twentieth Century Essays, selected by Hamilton, Hillier explores varying definitions of the essay form, and questions Hamilton's choices for this anthology.

I agreed, by telephone, to review [The Penguin Book of Twentieth Century Essays], and before it arrived by post I tried to work out a definition of ‘essay’. Yes, yes, I know it means a try. (If at first you don't succeed, essay, essay, essay again.) As practised by Montaigne and Bacon it meant a short article on a given subject, ‘Of Truth’, ‘Of Gardens’. But in the 20th century few writers have set themselves that sort of task, once they have escaped the school penance of ‘What I did in the holidays’ or ‘A day in the life of a coat-hanger’. And...

(read more)

This section contains 3,455 words
(approx. 12 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Bevis Hillier
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Bevis Hillier from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.