Sophonisba | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 24 pages of analysis & critique of Sophonisba.

Sophonisba | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 24 pages of analysis & critique of Sophonisba.
This section contains 6,528 words
(approx. 22 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by J. M. Armistead

SOURCE: Armistead, J. M. “Hero as Endangered Species: Sophonisba, or Hannibal's Overthrow. A Tragedy (1675).” In Nathaniel Lee, pp. 43-57. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1979.

In the following essay, Armistead discusses the structure and themes of Nathaniel Lee's most successful foray into the genre of heroic drama, Sophonisba.

In charting the modulation of high heroic drama into something resembling genuine tragedy, we can hardly afford to overlook Nathaniel Lee's first smash hit. That it usually is passed over suggests that most commentators have uncritically accepted impressionistic or satiric responses to the play—responses like those of the Earl of Rochester, Henry Fielding, and Sir Adolphus Ward, all of whom felt Lee had unforgivably distorted history into an extravaganza of ranting lovesickness. The most recent historian of Restoration drama, Robert D. Hume, continues this negative trend by reiterating the opinions of Dryden and Gerard Langbaine: Lee fails to unify his two plots...

(read more)

This section contains 6,528 words
(approx. 22 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by J. M. Armistead
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by J. M. Armistead from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.