King Henry IV, Part I | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 39 pages of analysis & critique of King Henry IV, Part I.

King Henry IV, Part I | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 39 pages of analysis & critique of King Henry IV, Part I.
This section contains 11,170 words
(approx. 38 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by David Bevington

SOURCE: Bevington, David. Introduction to The Oxford Shakespeare: Henry IV, Part I, edited by David Bevington, pp. 1-110. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.

In the following excerpt, Bevington discusses the structural unity and major themes of Henry IV, Parts 1 and 2, and considers the dramas' exposition of identity, honor, cowardice, father-son relations, and princely education.

The Question of Structural Unity

The debate over [E. M. W.] Tillyard's insistence on Elizabethan world-order as the key to Shakespeare's history plays has interesting ramifications, not only for characterization—e.g. is Falstaff a Vice tempter or a free spirit?—but also for structure. Are 1 and 2 Henry IV a unified whole, and integrally part of the larger structure of the Henriad, or is each play a separate theatrical event? Tillyard's argument … impels him towards the unitary view, towards seeing the rejection of Falstaff and the emergence of Henry V as the necessary conclusion to...

(read more)

This section contains 11,170 words
(approx. 38 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by David Bevington
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by David Bevington from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.