Between Facts and Norms | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 5 pages of analysis & critique of Between Facts and Norms.

Between Facts and Norms | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 5 pages of analysis & critique of Between Facts and Norms.
This section contains 1,470 words
(approx. 5 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Cass R. Sunstein

SOURCE: "Democracy Isn't What You Think," in The New York Times Book Review, August 18, 1996, p. 18.

Below, Sunstein reviews the question of political legitimacy addressed in Between Facts and Norms, especially Habermas's concept of "deliberative democracy."

Most people know that the Constitution's First Amendment provides the rights to freedom of speech and to the free exercise of religion. But in the first Congress some people seriously proposed that the First Amendment should contain another right: the right on the part of constituents "to instruct" their representatives how to vote. The first Congress ultimately rejected the proposal. Roger Sherman made the central argument against it. In Sherman's view, representatives had a "duty to meet others from the different parts of the Union, and consult…. If they were to be guided by instructions, there would be no use in deliberation." A right to instruct "would destroy the object of the meeting...

(read more)

This section contains 1,470 words
(approx. 5 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Cass R. Sunstein
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Cass R. Sunstein from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.