A River Sutra | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 17 pages of analysis & critique of A River Sutra.

A River Sutra | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 17 pages of analysis & critique of A River Sutra.
This section contains 4,562 words
(approx. 16 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by C. N. Ramachandran and A. G. Kahn

SOURCE: Ramachandran, C. N., and A. G. Kahn. “Gita Mehta's A River Sutra: Two Views.” Literary Criterion 29, no. 3 (1994): 1-15.

In the following essay, Ramachandran and Kahn offer two different critical perspectives on A River Sutra. Ramachandran asserts that the multitude of themes and characters in A River Sutra act as a mirror of modern India culture—diverse yet bound to the traditions of the past—while Kahn argues that the River Narmada—not the Bureaucrat/narrator—is the main character of the novel.

1. C. N. Ramachandran—mangalore University

A River Sutra is Gita Mehta's third novel, the other two being Karma Cola and Raj. While the first two novels are in the well-known comic-ironic mode, this novel can be said to be, roughly, in the allegorical mode. Further, one wonders whether A River Sutra can be called a novel at all. Having the Western Don Quixote and the...

(read more)

This section contains 4,562 words
(approx. 16 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by C. N. Ramachandran and A. G. Kahn
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by C. N. Ramachandran and A. G. Kahn from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.