Gerhart Hauptmann | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 38 pages of analysis & critique of Gerhart Hauptmann.

Gerhart Hauptmann | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 38 pages of analysis & critique of Gerhart Hauptmann.
This section contains 10,247 words
(approx. 35 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by James L. Hodge

SOURCE: “The Dramaturgy of Bahnwärter Thiel,” in Mosaic, Vol. IX, No. 3, Spring, 1976, pp. 97-116.

In the following essay, Hodge interprets Bahnwärter Thiel as “a prose drama, patterned on classical Greek tragedy and influenced by a demonic, Dionysian concept of tragedy similar to that propounded by Nietzsche.”

The symbolism ubiquitous in Hauptmann's novelle Bahnwärter Thiel (1888) has been interpreted from various perspectives. The trains and the weather have been interpreted by Professor Benno von Wiese1 and by Professor Karl Guthke2 as the expression of demonic forces. Professor Guthke specifically designates the demonic forces in Bahnwärter Thiel as “natural and technological.” Some of the other symbols, such as the two stags and the two squirrels, have been interpreted by Marianne Ordon3 as animal symbols for Thiel and Tobias.

Further interpretations of Bahnwärter Thiel should identify and explain the demonic power which underlies the technological and meteorological...

(read more)

This section contains 10,247 words
(approx. 35 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by James L. Hodge
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by James L. Hodge from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.