George Oppen | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 46 pages of analysis & critique of George Oppen.

George Oppen | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 46 pages of analysis & critique of George Oppen.
This section contains 10,414 words
(approx. 35 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Rachel Blau DuPlessis

SOURCE: “Oppen and Pound,” in Paideuma, Vol. 10, No. 2, Spring, 1981, pp. 59-83.

In the following essay, Blau DuPlessis discusses Pound's influence on Oppen's poetry, and examines their poetic and political dissimilarities.

… poetry must be at least as well written as prose, etc. It must also be at least as good as dead silence.1

In a review of Ginsberg, McClure and Olson, published in 1962, as he was publishing the poems of his return, George Oppen strongly suggests that each of these poets exemplifies a tendency in current writing which he must reject; by this review, Oppen tacitly situates himself in relation to some significant contemporaries. On a line between “histrionics and … openness,” Ginsberg's mode is often “declamatory”; indeed “to quarrel with that is simply to quarrel with the heart of his work.” McClure's mode reduces poetic desire to “excitement, intoxication, meaninglessness, a destruction of the sense of oneself among things...

(read more)

This section contains 10,414 words
(approx. 35 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Rachel Blau DuPlessis
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Rachel Blau DuPlessis from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.