The History of the Kings of Britain | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 24 pages of analysis & critique of The History of the Kings of Britain.

The History of the Kings of Britain | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 24 pages of analysis & critique of The History of the Kings of Britain.
This section contains 6,708 words
(approx. 23 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Christopher Brooke

SOURCE: “Geoffrey of Monmouth as a Historian,” in Church and Government in the Middle Ages, edited by C. N. L. Brooke et al., Cambridge University Press, 1976, pp. 77-91.

In the following essay, Brooke explores some possible motives and intentions of Geoffrey in writing The History of the Kings of Britain.

Geoffrey of Monmouth's History of the Kings of Britain1 purports to be a history of the rulers of Britain from the foundation of the British race by Brutus, great-gradson of Aeneas, in the second half of the second millennium b.c. to Cadwalader in the seventh century a.d. It is a shapely, well-conceived book, written in Latin in the style of contemporary histories; its climax and centrepiece is the account of King Arthur, the greatest of the British Kings; its comparatively matter-of-fact approach is only once set aside for more than a moment, in the Prophecies of...

(read more)

This section contains 6,708 words
(approx. 23 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Christopher Brooke
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Christopher Brooke from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.