The Wonderful Wizard of Oz | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 18 pages of analysis & critique of The Wonderful Wizard of Oz.

The Wonderful Wizard of Oz | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 18 pages of analysis & critique of The Wonderful Wizard of Oz.
This section contains 4,902 words
(approx. 17 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Richard Tuerk

SOURCE: Tuerk, Richard. “Dorothy's Timeless Quest.” Mythlore 17, no. 63 (autumn 1990): 20-4.

In the following essay, Tuerk finds that, despite Baum's assertions that his book differed from the pattern of European fairy-tales, The Wonderful Wizard of Oz is in fact structured as a monomyth.

In the preface to The Wonderful Wizard of Oz L. Frank Baum calls his book “a modernized fairy tale, in which the wonderment and joy are retained and the heart-aches and nightmares are left out.” He tried, he writes, to eliminate from it “the stereotyped genie, dwarf and fairy …, together with all the horrible and blood-curdling incident devised by … [the] authors” of European fairy stories “to point a fearsome moral to each tale” (2).

As readers recognize, however, Baum is a better creator than critic.1 In his book, Dorothy and her companions face “monstrous” Kalidahs with “bodies like bears and heads like tigers” (42), a witch “so wicked...

(read more)

This section contains 4,902 words
(approx. 17 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Richard Tuerk
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Richard Tuerk from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.