Francine du Plessix Gray | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 24 pages of analysis & critique of Francine du Plessix Gray.

Francine du Plessix Gray | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 24 pages of analysis & critique of Francine du Plessix Gray.
This section contains 6,447 words
(approx. 22 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Julian Barnes

SOURCE: “Romancing Flaubert,” in New York Review of Books, Vol. XLI, No. 10, May 26, 1994, pp. 12–16.

In the following review, Barnes offers a positive assessment of Rage and Fire, calling the biography “heartfelt and impassioned.”

Who burned Louise Colet's letters to Flaubert? For a century it was taken for granted that the destroyer was Flaubert's niece Caroline, the inheritor of his literary estate. Caroline, the stiff, correct, high-bourgeois protector, “la dame si bien,” who in publishing her uncle's correspondence cut out any passages she deemed intimate or indecent, suppressed uncomplimentary opinions, changed his punctuation, and tidied up his phrasing; who wouldn't allow the expression “tenir le bec hors de l'eau” in a letter to Turgenev, gentrifying it into “tenir la tête hors de l'eau.” Such editorial interventionism was of the period: when negotiating with Louise Colet's equally proper daughter, Mme. Bissieu, Caroline received permission to publish 138 of Flaubert's letters...

(read more)

This section contains 6,447 words
(approx. 22 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Julian Barnes
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Julian Barnes from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.