Philostratus | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 12 pages of analysis & critique of Philostratus.

Philostratus | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 12 pages of analysis & critique of Philostratus.
This section contains 2,785 words
(approx. 10 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Christopher Jones

SOURCE: Jones, Christopher. “The Emperor and the Giant.” Classical Philology 95, no. 4 (October 2000): 476-81.

In the following essay, Jones argues that a passage from Philostratus's Heroikos can help identify an emperor mentioned in a treatise by Pausanias; the critic claims that the man described is in fact Lucius Verus.

A passage of the periegete Pausanias mentions an “emperor (βασιλεύs) of the Romans” who discovered, or caused to be discovered, the bones of a giant in the bed of the river Orontes. Though the identification of the emperor has been discussed inconclusively for well over a century, it involves the history and topography of Antioch, one of the great cities of antiquity, and is therefore more than a mere puzzle. The present study argues that a passage of Philostratus' Heroicus, noticed in this connection but not read with sufficient care, may help to solve the problem.1

Pausanias' testimony can be...

(read more)

This section contains 2,785 words
(approx. 10 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Christopher Jones
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Christopher Jones from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.