Measure for Measure | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 33 pages of analysis & critique of Measure for Measure.

Measure for Measure | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 33 pages of analysis & critique of Measure for Measure.
This section contains 9,081 words
(approx. 31 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Kathleen McLuskie

SOURCE: “The Patriarchal Bard: Feminist Criticism and Shakespeare: King Lear and Measure for Measure,” in Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism, edited by Jonathan Dollimore and Alan Sinfield, Manchester University Press, 1985, pp. 88-108.

In the following essay, McLuskie reviews several feminist approaches to Shakespeare's plays, highlighting in particular the problems with the mimetic and essentialist models of feminist criticism. The critic then applies her critique of such feminist approaches to King Lear and Measure for Measure.

I

Every feminist critic has encountered the archly disingenous question ‘What exactly is feminist criticism?’ The only effective response is ‘I’ll send you a booklist’, for feminist criticism can only be defined by the multiplicity of critical practices engaged in by feminists. Owing its origins to a popular political movement, it reproduces the varied theoretical positions of that movement. Sociologists and theorists of culture have, for example, investigated the processes...

(read more)

This section contains 9,081 words
(approx. 31 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Kathleen McLuskie
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Kathleen McLuskie from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.