Feminist literary criticism | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 35 pages of analysis & critique of Feminist literary criticism.

Feminist literary criticism | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 35 pages of analysis & critique of Feminist literary criticism.
This section contains 9,562 words
(approx. 32 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Jonathan Dollimore

SOURCE: “Shakespeare, Cultural Materialism, Feminism and Marxist Humanism,” New Literary History, Vol. 21, No. 3, Spring 1990, pp. 471-93.

In the following essay, Dollimore explains and defends the approach of cultural materialism as a method of Shakespearean criticism, responds to feminist critics of this approach, and critiques feminist approaches to Shakespearean studies.

Back in 1982 Alan Sinfield and I thought that, despite obvious differences, there was sufficient convergence between British cultural materialism and American new historicism to bring the two together in a collection of essays. Things were different then, and we envisaged something like a progressive alliance between the two in a field that badly needed both. The result, Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism, appeared in 1985.1

Recent articles by American critics sympathetic to the British materialist critical project—including Carolyn Porter, Louis Montrose, Don Wayne, Walter Cohen, and Karen Newman—persuade me that something like an alliance has indeed...

(read more)

This section contains 9,562 words
(approx. 32 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Jonathan Dollimore
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Jonathan Dollimore from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.