The Spectator (1711) | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 28 pages of analysis & critique of The Spectator (1711).

The Spectator (1711) | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 28 pages of analysis & critique of The Spectator (1711).
This section contains 8,045 words
(approx. 27 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Albert Furtwangler

SOURCE: “The Making of Mr. Spectator,” in Modern Language Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 1, March 1977, pp. 21-39.

In following essay, Furtwangler contends that Mr. Spectator, the fictional editorial voice of the Spectator, was a “didactic figure” designed to promote the journal's “identification of moral improvement with reading improvement.”

Addison and Steele had a very practical reason for creating the fictitious editors of their periodical works: canny self-protection. Neither Addison the rising politician nor Steele the ambitious soldier-turned-Gazetteer could well afford to entertain a broad public or moralize in his own name. Yet from the broad leaves of this prudent disguise there grew a new blossom of art. Other early editors had hidden behind the titles of their journals, hoping to dodge the abundant risks of plain-spoken publishing or to achieve an authoritative tone with little effort. But in Isaac Bickerstaff of the Tatler Steele developed a full-blown alter ego, complete...

(read more)

This section contains 8,045 words
(approx. 27 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Albert Furtwangler
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Albert Furtwangler from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.