Dvoynik | Criticism

Feodor Dostoevsky
This literature criticism consists of approximately 17 pages of analysis & critique of Dvoynik.

Dvoynik | Criticism

Feodor Dostoevsky
This literature criticism consists of approximately 17 pages of analysis & critique of Dvoynik.
This section contains 4,671 words
(approx. 16 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Julian W. Connolly

SOURCE: “Madness and Doubling: From Dostoevsky's The Double to Nabokov's The Eye,” in Russian Literature Triquarterly, No. 24, 1991, pp. 129–39.

In the following essay, Connolly discusses The Double as a source of inspiration for Vladimir Nabokov's The Eye.

Vladimir Nabokov often expressed himself harshly when evaluating Fyodor Dostoevsky's abilities as a writer: “He was a prophet, a claptrap journalist and a slapdash comedian,” he told an interviewer in 1963,1 and in his Lectures on Russian Literature he stated that Dostoevsky was “not a great writer, but a rather mediocre one.”2 Not only did he criticize Dostoevsky in his lectures and interviews, he made fun of Dostoevsky in his fiction too, most notably in the novel Despair (Otchainie), where his narrator Hermann Karlovich calls Dostoevsky's novel Crime and Punishment “Crime and Slime” and “Crime and Pun.”3 Yet Dostoevsky wrote one work that Nabokov professed to admire—The Double (Dvoinik)—which he termed...

(read more)

This section contains 4,671 words
(approx. 16 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Julian W. Connolly
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Julian W. Connolly from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.