Dream Story | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 5 pages of analysis & critique of Dream Story.

Dream Story | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 5 pages of analysis & critique of Dream Story.
This section contains 1,367 words
(approx. 5 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by John Simon

SOURCE: Simon, John. “Not with a Bang …” National Review 51, no. 15 (9 August 1999): 54-6.

In the following review of Eyes Wide Shut, the 1999 film based on Schnitzler's Dream Story, Simon asserts that the film is based on a misinterpretation of the novella.

If previous ages tended blindly to ignore their geniuses, ours is all too ready to crown as genius the nearest trendy hack. One of the very few masters not fully acknowledged even posthumously is the Viennese playwright-fiction writer Arthur Schnitzler (1862-1931), most of whose many works are poorly, if at all, translated into English.

Hence it may be unsurprising if, for his last movie, Eyes Wide Shut, Stanley Kubrick, along with his co-scenarist, Frederic Raphael, misread the work it was “inspired by,” Schnitzler's Traumnovelle (Dream Story, 1926). That the director died four days after completing the film, and before putting in his usual last-minute finishing touches, makes the result...

(read more)

This section contains 1,367 words
(approx. 5 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by John Simon
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by John Simon from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.