Diana Trilling | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 11 pages of analysis & critique of Diana Trilling.

Diana Trilling | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 11 pages of analysis & critique of Diana Trilling.
This section contains 2,973 words
(approx. 10 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Saul Maloff

SOURCE: “Flaubert and Freud and the Scarsdale Diet Doctor: Mrs. Trilling's Mrs. Harris,” in Commonweal, February 12, 1982, pp. 89-92.

In the following review, Maloff faults what he considers Trilling's psychoanalytic misreading of the Scarsdale murder, finding that her interpretation of the case is closer to pulp fiction than great literature.

For Diana Trilling to evoke the immortal ghosts of Emma Bovary and Anna Karenina in her book of meditations on Jean Harris1 is not only natural, it is inevitable. Suicide conferred on the fictional characters—what?—stature, significance, dignity, transcendent reality, splendor even, a kind of magnificence which neither possesses in the imagined “life” of the great novels and both acquired only through death. Otherwise, both would have died of ennui and inanition, and we along with them: we are unable to imagine an interesting ongoing life for them.

And so it is with Jean Harris: she came to...

(read more)

This section contains 2,973 words
(approx. 10 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Saul Maloff
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Saul Maloff from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.