Dune (film) | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of Dune (film).

Dune (film) | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of Dune (film).
This section contains 765 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Michael Wilmington

SOURCE: Wilmington, Michael. “Dune Is Slow Going but Apt to Stick in the Mind.” Los Angeles Times (14 December 1984): section 6, p. 8.

In the following review, Wilmington assesses Lynch's use of dark, obsessive, and bizarre visual imagery in Dune, noting that the film as a whole is not necessarily successful.

The multimillion-dollar adaptation of Frank Herbert's best-selling science-fiction novel, Dune with its evocative and densely detailed vision of a desert planet where mammoth worms capable of swallowing whole express trains burrow through the sand, is one of the year's most peculiar films. It's cold, strange and remote. It's lit in such dark tones that, watching it, we often seem to be wandering through some vast, echoing mausoleum. It unfolds at a measured, lugubrious, almost maddening pace. And Herbert's byzantine plot is ruthlessly condensed and shoe-horned into a 140-minute running time that seems barely adequate.

Yet [Dune], opening citywide today, is...

(read more)

This section contains 765 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Michael Wilmington
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Michael Wilmington from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.