Brief Interviews with Hideous Men | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of Brief Interviews with Hideous Men.

Brief Interviews with Hideous Men | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of Brief Interviews with Hideous Men.
This section contains 599 words
(approx. 2 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Robert L. McLaughlin

SOURCE: McLaughlin, Robert L. Review of Brief Interviews with Hideous Men, by David Foster Wallace. Review of Contemporary Fiction 19, no. 3 (fall 1999): 158-59.

In the following review, McLaughlin lauds Brief Interviews with Hideous Men as a “virtuoso display” and a fine literary achievement.

In Brief Interviews with Hideous Men David Foster Wallace collects twenty-three pieces of fiction, most written since the publication of Infinite Jest in 1996. Few of these are stories in the conventional sense. Rather, the book makes into fiction many other forms: the title interviews, which provide the structure of the book; monologues; a play; pop quizzes; an outline; and harder-to-define nonnarrative snapshots of various characters and their lives. The results are both familiar, as we recognize techniques and themes from Wallace's earlier work, and surprising, as we see Wallace taking his post-big-novel work in new directions.

The various pieces here work together to explore three interconnected...

(read more)

This section contains 599 words
(approx. 2 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Robert L. McLaughlin
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Robert L. McLaughlin from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.