Morning, Noon and Night | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 8 pages of analysis & critique of Morning, Noon and Night.

Morning, Noon and Night | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 8 pages of analysis & critique of Morning, Noon and Night.
This section contains 2,283 words
(approx. 8 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by John Updike

SOURCE: "Indifference," in Picked-Up Pieces, Alfred A. Knopf, 1976, pp. 416-22.

Updike is a prolific, Pulitzer Prize-winning American novelist, critic, short story writer, essayist, poet, and dramatist. In the review below, originally published November 2, 1968, in The New Yorker, he faults Morning Noon and Night for its stuffy, tedious, pessimistic, and pedantic style.

Beginning, forty years ago, with a style of sober purity, James Gould Cozzens has purposefully evolved a prose unique in its mannered ugliness, a monstrous mix of Sir Thomas Browne, legalese, and Best-Remembered Quotations. The opening chapter of his new novel, Morning Noon and Night, cloudy as a polluted pond, swarms with verbal organisms of his strange engendering. As Cozzen-sologists before me have discovered, there is no substitute for the tabulated list. We have the Unresisted Cliché:

Here are clouds of witnesses, faces and forms in serried ranks …

I don't intend here any telling in mournful numbers...

(read more)

This section contains 2,283 words
(approx. 8 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by John Updike
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by John Updike from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.