Clive Barker's Books of Blood | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 57 pages of analysis & critique of Clive Barker's Books of Blood.

Clive Barker's Books of Blood | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 57 pages of analysis & critique of Clive Barker's Books of Blood.
This section contains 14,961 words
(approx. 50 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Linda Badley

SOURCE: Badley, Linda. “Clive Barker Writing (from) the Body.” In Writing Horror and the Body: The Fiction of Stephen King, Clive Barker, and Anne Rice, pp. 73-104. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1996.

In the following essay, Badley analyzes Barker's Books of Blood, his films, and his other literary work.

With Books of Blood, an obscure playwright and illustrator named Clive Barker launched the “post-King era of horror fiction,” as William Gibson has called it (“Introduction” xv). “You read him with book in one hand and an airsick bag in the other,” King joked in 1986, adding “That man is not fooling around” (qtd. in Kanfer 83). Perhaps more importantly, Barker was as intellectual and politically subversive as King was not.

Barker challenged the modern horror genre as King had exemplified and defined it. “A lot of horror is written to reassure people the values they bring to the book are … correct...

(read more)

This section contains 14,961 words
(approx. 50 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Linda Badley
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Linda Badley from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.