Amy Clampitt | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of Amy Clampitt.

Amy Clampitt | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of Amy Clampitt.
This section contains 782 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by J. D. McCIatchy

SOURCE: "Short Reviews," in Poetry, Vol. 143, No. 3, December, 1983, pp. 163-67.

In this brief review of The Kingfisher, McCIatchy comments on Clampitt's similarities to Marianne Moore, especially in their use of language, their exuberance, and their moralism.

"It is a privilege to see so / much confusion," said Marianne Moore. By "confusion" she meant the world's own welter, its facts, artifacts, curios, and contradiction. And by "privilege" she meant their moral ordering. Amy Clampitt is a poet in the mold of Moore. For several years now I have been excitedly following Clampitt's poems as they appeared in magazines. As Leigh Hunt said of Congreve, they were "full as an egg of some kind of wit or sense in almost every sentence." Some of the poems—"Times Square Water Music," "Exmoor," "Good Friday," and "Marginal Employment" come back to mind—even sounded like Moore. But it was not that studied resemblance...

(read more)

This section contains 782 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by J. D. McCIatchy
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by J. D. McCIatchy from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.