Seize the Day | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 9 pages of analysis & critique of Seize the Day.

Seize the Day | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 9 pages of analysis & critique of Seize the Day.
This section contains 2,562 words
(approx. 9 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Carol M. Sicherman

The linguistic lowpoint of Saul Bellow's brief novel Seize the Day—and one of its comic delights—is Dr. Tamkin's poem, deliciously entitled "Mechanism vs Functionalism: Ism vs Hism." The very paper on which Tamkin has typed his poem (it has "ruled borders in red ink") warns us to expect a student production, and Bellow exceeds expectation by delivering a classic non-poem by someone who thinks that rhyme and sing-song iambs, archaically decorated with inversions and the ungrammatical second-person singular, are the vital constituents of poetry.

In the poem, Tamkin, self-described as a "psychological poet,"… advises his audience: "Why-forth then dost thou tarry … Seek ye then that which art not there." Small wonder that Bellow's bewildered protagonist, Tommy Wilhelm, cannot get beyond his initial reaction: "What kind of mishmash, claptrap is this!" But Tommy, who remembers Literature I at Penn State as the "one course that now made...

(read more)

This section contains 2,562 words
(approx. 9 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Carol M. Sicherman
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Carol M. Sicherman from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.