Eduard Bagritsky | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 14 pages of analysis & critique of Eduard Bagritsky.

Eduard Bagritsky | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 14 pages of analysis & critique of Eduard Bagritsky.
This section contains 4,167 words
(approx. 14 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Boris Thomson

SOURCE: "Bagritsky's 'February'," in Lot's Wife and the Venus ofMilo: Conflicting Attitudes to the Cultural Heritage in Modern Russia, Cambridge University Press, 1978, pp. 77-97.

In the following excerpt, which was originally published as a section of the chapter "The Secret of Art: Two Soviet Myths" in Lot's Wife and the Venus of Milo, Thomson argues that Bagritsky's autobiographical "February," his final work, expresses a surprisingly ambivalent attitude toward the pre-Revolutionary past.

In the early part of his career Bagritsky was known as an ardent advocate of the continuity of poetic culture, with a reputation for a detailed knowledge of even the most recondite and unfashionable poets of the preceding epoch. In his later years, however, partly as a consequence of his hardening political attitudes, he seems to have moved towards a total repudiation of the past. His last poem, 'February,' presents a strange synthesis of these contradictory...

(read more)

This section contains 4,167 words
(approx. 14 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Boris Thomson
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Boris Thomson from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.