The Sweet Hereafter | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 16 pages of analysis & critique of The Sweet Hereafter.

The Sweet Hereafter | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 16 pages of analysis & critique of The Sweet Hereafter.
This section contains 4,157 words
(approx. 14 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Patricia Pearson

SOURCE: “The Sweet Here and Now,” in Saturday Night, Vol. 113, No. 3, April, 1998, pp. 67–72.

In the following essay, Pearson compares the commercial and critical success of The Sweet Hereafter to Egoyan's background as an independent screenwriter and director.

Atom Egoyan always said he was deeply suspicious of the Oscars. Then he got nominated.

The first time I spied Atom Egoyan, at a Christmas party for Toronto's arts and letters set, the handsome thirty-seven-year-old director was engrossed in conversation with Greg Gatenby, head of the International Festival of Authors. Slightly hunched, with one hand grasping his chin, he seemed unaware that the crowd surrounding them had come alive with whispers and glances. “Is that Atom Egoyan?” someone near me inquired excitedly. “Hey,” someone else hissed, “I think that's Egoyan.” A hiply clad woman with honey hair approached and stuck out her hand: “Atom, I don't know if you remember, I...

(read more)

This section contains 4,157 words
(approx. 14 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Patricia Pearson
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Patricia Pearson from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.