Aratus | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 7 pages of analysis & critique of Aratus.

Aratus | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 7 pages of analysis & critique of Aratus.
This section contains 1,849 words
(approx. 7 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Carl Springer

SOURCE: Springer, Carl. “Aratus and the Cups of Menalcas: A Note on Eclogue 3.42.” Classical Journal 79, no. 2 (1984): 131-34.

In the following essay, Springer notes allusions to Aratus in Virgil's third Eclogue.

In Vergil's third Eclogue the herdsman Menalcas has forgotten the name of one of the two figures carved on the drinking cups which he proposes to wager in an amoebaean singing contest with another herdsman, Damoetas. Menalcas can only remember the name of Conon, a third-century astronomer at the court of Ptolemy Philadelphus. So he asks Damoetas:

… quis fuit alter, descripsit radio totum qui gentibus orbem, tempora quae messor, quae curvos arator haberet. 

(vv. 40-2)

Damoetas ignores the question, and instead describes his own cups, made by the same craftsman.

Students of Vergil have long attempted to come to Menalcas' rescue. Servius suggests Aratus, Ptolemy, or Eudoxus.1 Junius Philargyrius chooses either Eudoxus or Aratus, although he admits that...

(read more)

This section contains 1,849 words
(approx. 7 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Carl Springer
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Carl Springer from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.