Aratus | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 45 pages of analysis & critique of Aratus.

Aratus | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 45 pages of analysis & critique of Aratus.
This section contains 9,459 words
(approx. 32 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Emma Gee

SOURCE: Gee, Emma. “Cicero's Astronomy.” Classical Quarterly 51, no. 2 (2001): 520-36.

In the following essay, Gee assesses Cicero's Aratea—a Latin adaptation of Aratus's Phaenomena—comparing two versions of the work and analyzing the symbolic and philosophical concepts highlighted in Cicero's strongly Stoic interpretation of the poem.

1. Introduction1

Imagine that the only reliable way of telling the time of year was by the stars. The observer would have to know the positions of the constellations and their movements relative to one another, and to be aware of the meteorological phenomena accompanying them. This is the information Aratus' Phaenomena gives us: the poet maps the position of the stars; he provides a celestial relative chronology; and he explains what sort of weather can be expected to accompany which movement of which constellation.

The Julian calendar reform meant that observation of the stars became unnecessary. When the celestial and civil years are...

(read more)

This section contains 9,459 words
(approx. 32 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Emma Gee
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Emma Gee from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.