Aratus | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 48 pages of analysis & critique of Aratus.

Aratus | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 48 pages of analysis & critique of Aratus.
This section contains 8,305 words
(approx. 28 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by G. O. Hutchinson

SOURCE: Hutchinson, G. O. “Other Poets: Aratus.” In Hellenistic Poetry, pp. 214-35. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.

In the following excerpt, Hutchinson presents a detailed structural, thematic, and linguistic analysis of the Phaenomena.

We consider first Aratus, whose poetic career overlapped with Callimachus'.1 The only substantial work of his to survive is the Phaenomena. The poem was praised by Callimachus and others for its elegance; it also contains some elevated passages on the gods.2 We should not allow either fact to limit too greatly our approach to the poem. It does have for its core a poetic version of two exceedingly dry works in prose. The first part, on constellations, draws on the Phaenomena of the astronomer Eudoxus (5th-4th cc.); the second, on weather-signs, draws on a work perhaps by the philosopher Theophrastus (4th-3rd cc.). Many sentences of Eudoxus' work survive in quotation; the other work is...

(read more)

This section contains 8,305 words
(approx. 28 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by G. O. Hutchinson
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by G. O. Hutchinson from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.