Antony and Cleopatra | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 18 pages of analysis & critique of Antony and Cleopatra.

Antony and Cleopatra | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 18 pages of analysis & critique of Antony and Cleopatra.
This section contains 4,019 words
(approx. 14 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by G. R. Hibbard

SOURCE: "Feliciter audax: Antony and Cleopatra, I, i, I-24," in Shakespeare's Styles: Essays in Honour of Kenneth Muir, Philip Edwards, Inga-Stina Ewbank, and G.K. Hunter, eds., Cambridge University Press, 1980, pp. 95-109.

In the following excerpt, Hibbard discusses Shakespeare's use of language in Antony and Cleopatra, describing the play's style as "an astonishing union of the hyperbolical with the simple, the downright, and the direct."

              [Enter Demetrius and Philo.]
Philo. Nay, but this dotage of our general's
     O'erflows the measure. Those his goodly
              eyes,
     That o'er the files and musters of the war
     Have glowed like plated Mars, now bend,
             now turn,
The office and devotion of their view
Upon a tawny front. His captain's heart,
Which in the scuffles of great fights haht
       burst
The buckles on his breast, reneges all
        temper,
And is become the bellows and the fan
To cool a gipsy's lust.
[Flourish Enter...

(read more)

This section contains 4,019 words
(approx. 14 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by G. R. Hibbard
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by G. R. Hibbard from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.