Angela Carter | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 30 pages of analysis & critique of Angela Carter.

Angela Carter | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 30 pages of analysis & critique of Angela Carter.
This section contains 8,298 words
(approx. 28 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Peter G. Christensen

SOURCE: Christensen, Peter G. “Farewell to the Femme Fatale: Angela Carter's Rewriting of Frank Wedekind's Lulu Plays.” Marvels and Tales: Journal of Fairy Tale Studies 12, no. 1 (1998): 319-36.

In the following essay, Christensen examines Carter's “demythologizing” of the Lulu character in her revisions of the Lulu plays.

In her book The Sexual Circus: Wedekind's Theatre of Subversion (32-35, 60-65), Elizabeth Boa notes the importance of fairy-tale motifs in Wedekind's major plays, Spring Awakening (Frühlingserwachen, 1891), and the Lulu plays, Earth Spirit (Erdgeist, 1895) and Pandora's Box (Die Büchse der Pandora, 1904). She writes that “in fairy tales—Rumpelstilzchen is the best known example—naming gives power over demons” (60). The eponymous heroine of the Lulu plays is the “demonic” character whom men try to control by naming. Given Angela Carter's work as a collector, translator, and adapter of fairy tales, it does not come as a complete surprise that one of...

(read more)

This section contains 8,298 words
(approx. 28 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Peter G. Christensen
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Peter G. Christensen from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.