Albertus Magnus | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 7 pages of analysis & critique of Albertus Magnus.

Albertus Magnus | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 7 pages of analysis & critique of Albertus Magnus.
This section contains 1,952 words
(approx. 7 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Thomas Greenwood

SOURCE: "Albertus Magnus: His Scientific Views," in Nature, Vol. 129, No. 3251, February 20, 1932, pp. 266-68.

In the following essay, Greenwood comments on Albert's scientific writings "as they represent the state of scientific knowledge in the Middle Ages."

"Everything there was to be known, he knew." Thus is the genius of Albert the Great characterised by the Pope in the remarkable Bull "In Thesauris Sapientiæ" declaring the blessed Bishop of Regensburg a saint and a doctor of the Church. In this "Decretal Letter", dated Dec. 16, 1931, but published on Jan. 14, 1932, Pope Pius XI. points out that Albert the Great (1206-1280) was not only a lover of God, a pastor of souls, and a master of the sacred sciences, but also a pioneer in secular knowledge. He wrote about astronomy, physics, mechanics, chemistry, mineralogy, anthropology, zoology, botany, architecture, and the applied arts; and the modern edition of his writings makes thirty-eight thick quarto...

(read more)

This section contains 1,952 words
(approx. 7 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Thomas Greenwood
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Thomas Greenwood from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.